Art and Society in Two Theoretical Approaches: A Comparative Analysis of Bourdieu's and Adorno's Views on Sociology of Art

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Instructor of Social Sciences of Payame-Noor, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Sociology, Yasouj university, Yasouj, Iran(Corresponding author)

Abstract
This study aims to investigate the complex dialectic between art and society through a critical comparison of the perspectives of Theodor Adorno and Pierre Bourdieu, two thinkers who, from distinct intellectual traditions, have each addressed the social origins of art and its relations to power. Methodologically, the research employs a documentary and comparative‑critical approach, drawing on Adorno’s theoretical critique and Bourdieu’s empirical analyses to explore the social and cultural forces shaping artistic production and perception. Within the framework of the Frankfurt School, Adorno conceives of art as a domain of resistance to the logic of the market and ideological domination, emphasizing its relative autonomy as a liberating force. In contrast, Bourdieu, through the concepts of field, cultural capital, and habitus, demonstrates that aesthetic taste and artistic production are reproduced within class structures and unequal power relations. The findings indicate that contemporary art possesses a dual and paradoxical nature: it can both reproduce mechanisms of domination and embody capacities for critique and resistance. The study concludes that a comprehensive understanding of the sociology of contemporary art requires the integration of Adorno’s critical approach with Bourdieu’s field‑based analysis.

Keywords

Subjects


Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 22 July 2026

  • Receive Date 30 October 2025
  • Revise Date 31 March 2026
  • Accept Date 17 July 2026