In Search of the Subaltern in Comparative Literature

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University

Abstract

In this article, by way of reviewing Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s views on “Subaltern Studies,” we will study her recent work in Comparative Literature. Spivak, who has constantly positioned herself against the elitist structure and discourse of the humanities in both Western and developing societies, believes that the comparative study of world literature, which today is in tandem with the capitalist logic of globalization, requires a methodological reorganization beyond the Eurocentric history of the discipline, as well as a turn to language learning from subaltern communities, including the refugees, the labour migrants, and other victims of the history of imperialism and global capitalism. In the pages that follow, by reading a selection of Spivak’s work—“Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1985), Death of a Discipline (2003), and “Rethinking Comparativism” (2009)—we will answer this question: Will postcolonial literary traditions (such as Persian literature) have the opportunity to express themselves on the global stage from within the framework of Comparative Literature? Spivak’s response is “Yes,” subject to the growth of the critic’s awareness of the inequalities prevalent in the global literary system, and the deconstruction of literary studies towards a discipline which Spivak calls “new comparative literature”: a new paradigm that is based on “deep language learning,” and the analysis of the culture and literature of the “subaltern” peoples.

Keywords

References

وفا، امیرحسین (۱۳۹۷). «مرگ یک رشته و استعمارزدایی از ادبیات تطبیقی.» مترجم. دورۀ بیست و ششم، شمارۀ ۶۲. 9۱ـ8۱. 
Abu-Lughod, Janet L (1989). Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250-1350. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Abu-Lughod, Lila (2013). Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths and Hellen Tiffin (2007). Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.  
Bassnett, Susan (1993). Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 
Cain, William E., Larue A. Finke, John McGowan, T. Denean Sharpley-Whiting, and Jeffrey J. Williams (2008). The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. 3rd edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 
Eisenstein, Zillah (2004). Against Empire: Feminisms, Racism, and the West. New York: Bloomsbury. 
Guha, Ranajit. (Ed.). (1982). Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Delhi: Oxford University Press. 
Mufti, Aamir R. (2018). Forget English! Orientalisms and World Literatures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 
Spivak, Gayatri Chakvravorty (1988 [1985]). “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In: Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. (pp. 271-313). (Eds.), Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education. 
Spivak, Gayatri Chakvravorty (2003). Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press. 
Spivak, Gayatri Chakvravorty (2008 [1999]). “From A Critique of Postcolonial Reason.” In The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. 3rd edition. (pp. 1997-2012). (Eds.), William E. Cain et al. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 
Spivak, Gayatri Chakvravorty (Summer 2009). “Rethinking Comparativism.” New Literary History (The John Hopkins University Press), 40(3). 609-626. doi: 10.1353/nlh.0.0095.
Mignolo, Walter D. (2013). “On Comparison: Who Is Comparing What and Why?” In Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. (Eds.), Rita Felski and Susan Stanford Friedman. Baltimore:  John Hopkins University Press. 
Wa Thiong’o, Ngugi (1986). Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Nairobi: EAEP. 
Wellek, René (2009 [1959]). “The Crisis of Comparative Literature.” In: The Princeton Sourcebook in Comparative Literature. (pp. 161-172). (Eds.), David Damrosch et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 
Vafa, Amirhossein (2020). “Lost in Paradise: On the ‘Coloniality’ of English Literary Studies in Iran.” International Journal of Middle East Studies (Cambridge University Press), 52(2). 334-339. doi: 10.1017/S0020743820000306
Zeiny, Esmaeil (2019). “Academic Imperialism: Towards Decolonisation of English Literature in Iranian Universities.” Asian Journal of Social Science (Brill), 47(1). 88-109. doi: 10.1163/15685314-04701005
 
Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature, Arts and Humanities
Volume 1, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
February 2022
Pages 63-82

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 22 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 14 January 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics