Free Play of Imagination in Art to Make Meaning in Pain: A Comparative Study of Nabokov’s Invitation to a Beheading and Dogville

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of English Language and Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of English Literature, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Letters and Human Scuiences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)

Abstract

By focusing on pain as a phenomenon that deprives individuals of meaning, the present study illuminates how the free play of imagination in art is able to defy pain and help individuals attain meaning. As an interdisciplinary research in literature and cinema and through a comparative approach, this study applies Scarry’s notion of pain in The Body in Pain, the Making and Unmaking of the World to Nabokov’s Invitation to a Beheading (1935) and Von Trier’s Dogville (2003). To do so, first Scarry’s definition of pain (torture) in physical and verbal act is presented. Then disruption of meaning by pain is discussed. Third, the transformative role of pain is explained to show how pain can embed in itself ways to pass through pain. Finally, the free play of imagination (art) is discussed to clarify whether and how it can help attain meaning in pain. Through close reading, these definitions and notions are applied to the selected works and especially to their main characters, Cincinnatus and Grace. In conclusion it is asserted that Nabokov and Von Trier, although different artists in the first glance, share notable grounds in their oeuvre. Enjoying Brechtian alienation, game play, parody and complex defamiliarizing narration, they create a diegetic world surpassing ideological, social and psychological issues encompassing characters/events that are not clear copies of reality but the result of the free play of imagination to undo the annihilating power of pain.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Apple Jr. Alfred (1967). “An Interview with Vladimir Nabokov.” Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature, VII &VIII: 2, pp. 131-140.   
     https://archive.org/details/sim_contemporary-literature_1966-1967_7-8_cumulative-index
Barabtarlo, Gennady (1990). “Within and Without Cincinnatus’s Cell: Reference Gauges in Nabokov’s Invitation to a Beheading.” Slavic Review, 4:3, pp.390–97. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2499985. Accessed 23 May 2023.
Boyd, Brian (2011). “The Psychologist.” The American Scholar, 80:4, pp. 47–55. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41434988. Accessed 6 May 2023.
Boyd, Brian (1990). Nabokov: The Russian Years. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Boyd, Brian (1997). “Welcome to the Block: (Priglashenie na kazn’) Invitation to a Beheading: A Documentary Record.” Edited by Julian Connolly, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, pp.140-179. 
Connolly, Julian W (1997). “Invitation to a Beheading: Nabokov’s ‘Violin in a Void’.” Invitation to a Beheading: A Critical Companion. Edited by Julian Connolly, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, pp.3-46.
Dogville (2003). Directed by Lars Von Trier, Zoma Films.
Dominguez, Cesar. Haun Saussy & Dario Villanueva (2015). Introducing Comparative Literature: New Trends and Applications. London and New York: Routledge.
Fitzsimmons, Lorna (2001). “Artistic Subjectivity in Nabokov’s The Defense and Invitation to a Beheading.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, 21:1-2. pp.55-60. 
Guyard, Marius-François (1965). La Littérature comparée. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Habash, Nicolas Lema (2017). “Critique of Calculation: Labour, Productivity, Limits, and Love in Lars Von Trier’s Dogville.” Revue Canadienne d’Études Cinématographiques / Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 26:1, pp.24–44. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26532119. Accessed 6 June 2023.
Hall, Stewart (1973). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
McCarty, Timothy Wyman (2015). “Good Readers and Good Liberals: Nabokov’s Aesthetic Liberalism.” Political Theory, 43: 6, pp.753–76. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24571696. Accessed 6 May 2023.
Nabokov, Vladimir (1959). Invitation to a Beheading. New York: Vintage Books.
Pifer, Ellen I (1970). “Nabokov’s ‘Invitation to a Beheading’: The Parody of a Tradition.” Pacific Coast Philology, 5. pp.46–53.  JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1316761. Accessed 21 May 2023.
Scarry, Elaine (1985). The Body in Pain, The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: oxford University Press.
Simons, Jan (2007). Playing the Waves: Lars von Trier’s Game Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Simons, Jan (2008). “Von Trier’s Cinematic Games.” Journal of Film and Video, 60: 1, pp.3–13. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20688581. Accessed 6 June 2023.
Staat, Wim (2007). “Dogville Characterized by ‘The Grapes of Wrath’: European Identity Construction through American Genre Conventions.” Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media, 48: 1, pp.79–96. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41552480. Accessed 7 June 2023.
Vetlessen, Arne Johan (2009). A Philosophy of Pain. London: Reaktion Books.
Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature, Arts and Humanities
Volume 3, Issue 2 - Serial Number 6
January 2024
Pages 219-244

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 July 2023
  • Revise Date: 20 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 14 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics