A Comparative Study of The Hypocrites of Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales and Hafez’s Divan

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Department of English, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Hypocrisy is described as the mother of evils in both Islam and Christianity. In scriptures of these religions, the hypocrites are described as those who apparently profess to the two faiths but in heart they are either antagonistic to them or exploit them as means for satisfying their worldly desires. However, the evil becomes menacing when the hypocrites claim a place in the political power structures. In the fourteenth-century societies of England and Fars (Shiraz,) due to the pervasive presence of hypocrite clerics and their significant influence both on the common people and in the power structure, the hypocrisy of these men was a major topic in literature of the time. In two masterpieces of English and Persian literatures of this century, that is The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer (1342/43- 1400), and the Divan of Khājeh Shams-Adīn Moḥammad Ḥāfeẓ-e Shīrāzī (1325- 1390), the hypocrite men of religion were prime target of ridicule and criticism. This article is an attempt to show that despite the difference in genre, the two works seem to focus on and highlight the same concern about hypocrisy and the hypocrites. Moreover, in their treatment of the theme of religious hypocrisy, the two poets seem to have adopted some similar methods of characterization and focused on identical and shared features of the hypocrite men of religion in the Divan and The Canterbury Tales.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abrams, M. H. ed. (1986). Norton Anthology of English Literature. New York: W. W. Norton    & Company, Inc.
Aers, David. (1986) Chaucer. Great Britain: The Harvest Press Limited.
Anushirvani, Alireza. (2022). “Classical Persian Poetry and World Literature: The Case of Hafez.” The Routledge Handbook of Persian Literary Translation, edited by Pouneh Shabani-  Jadidi, Patricia J. Higgins and Michelle Quay, Routledge, 2022, pp. 69-84.
Amory, Frederic. (1986) “Whited Sepulchres: The Semantic History of Hypocrisy to the High Middle Ages.” Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale, vol. 53, pp. 5–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26188893. Accessed 9 July 2024.
Anjavi Shirazi, Abulghasim, ed. (1981). Diwan-E-Hafez (Diwan of Hafez) 4th ed. Tehran: Javidan Publishing Organization. 
Bicknell, Herman. (1976) Hafiz of Shiraz; a selection form his poems. Tehran: Imperial Organization for Social Services.
Cooper, Helen. (1989). The Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Encyclopedia Iranica Online, s.v. “Hafez” (by Ehsan Yarshater)
Fletcher, Alan J. (1990). “The Topical Hypocrisy of Chaucer’s Pardoner.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 110–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25094158. Accessed 13 June 2024.
Hafiz, (Reprint of 1891 ed.). The Divan-i-hafiz. Translated by H Wilberforce Clarke, Maryland: Ibex Publishers.
Howard, R. (1978). The Idea of Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Khorramshahi, Baha-odin. (1999). Hafez-Nā’meh Vol. II. Tehran: Shirkat-Intisharat Ilmi-Farhangi (Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company).
Khorramshahi, Baha-odin. (2012). “Hafez,” Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition (accessed on 2 April 2024).
Kris, Anton O. (2005). “The Lure of Hypocrisy.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, vol. 53, no. 1, Mar., pp. 7–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651050530011001. Accessed 29 Mar. 2022.
Leff, Gordon. (1967). Heresy in the Later Middle Ages: The disputes within the Franciscan order. United Kingdom, Manchester University Press.
‌Lewisohn, Leonard. (2010) Hafiz and the Religion of Love in Classical Persian Poetry. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mann, Jill. (1973) Chucer and Medieval Estates Satire: The Literature of Social Classes and the General Prologue to the “Canterbury Tales”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moein, Mohammad. (1990). Hafez Shirin Sokhan. Tehran: Sherkat Intisharat Moein 
Murtazavi, Manuchehr. (1964). Maktab-e-Hafez (The School of Hafez). Tehran: Intisharat-e-tus.
Prawer, Siegbert Salomon. (1973) Comparative Literary Studies: An Introduction.  New York: Duckworth Books.‌
Rigby, H. S. (1996) Chaucer in Context. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Ruggiers, Paul G. (1965) The Art of the Canterbury Tales. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press,).
Somerset, Fiona. (2001). “‘Mark Him Wel for He Is on of Þo’: Training the ‘Lewed’ Gaze to Discern Hypocrisy.” ELH, vol. 68, no. 2, , pp. 315–34. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30031971. Accessed 13 June 2024.
‌Weisstein, ‌Ulrich  and Riggan, William. (1988) Comparative Literature and Literary Theory: Survey and Introduction. Taipei, Bookman Books.
Williams, Arnold. (1953). “Chaucer and the Friars.” Speculum, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 499–513. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2847024. Accessed 13 June 2024.
Zarrinkub, Abdulhussein. (1984). Az Kuchey-E-Rindan (Through the Topper’s Alley: On the Life and Poetry of Hafez) 4th ed. Tehran: Amirkabir Publishing Institute.