The Forty Rules of Love: a Mystical Eliadean Perspective

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of English Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

This interdisciplinary study is a mystical reconsideration of Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love (2011), FRL hereafter, based on the theologian Mircea Eliade’s perspective on the notion of sacred life as hierophany. Considering the huge bulk of reviews analyzing the Eastern Sufi aspect of the novel as a mystical stand, this investigation probes the compatibility of Eliade’s Universalist spiritual stand with the Sufi perspective reflected in the novel, considering the Islamic tradition through focusing on Maulana’s mystical transformation via Shams of Tabriz. It also pays attention to the Western cultural manifestations absent in most of the reviews and considers the Orientalist features attributed to the novel by some critics. The investigation concludes that the form of Sufism represented in the novel is close to Maulana’s original perspective, and there is a spiritual congruity between Maulana’s Islamic stand, being affected by Ibn Arabi, and Eliade’s Western Christian one. This justifies the depiction of the characters’ mystical transformation within FRL as being touched by Islamic principles and not totally submissive before the Orientalist discourse.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmed, Zaib-un-Nisa, et al. (2016). “An Exploratory Study of the Sufi Metaphysical Concept ‘Wahdatal Wujud’ in Elif Shafaq’s Novel ‘Forty Rules of Love.’” Istanbul, Turkey.  Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2016 3rd International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities. https://www.ocerint.org/socioint16_e-proceedings/abstracts/a300.html.
Amna, Zain, et al. (2018).  “Texts within Text: An Intertextual Study of Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love.” NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 16:I, pp.  1-26. https://www.numl.edu.pk/journals/subjects/1566298676article%203.pdf.
Bugti, Nayab Aziz, and Fouzia Rehman Khan (2019). “Doctrine of Fana and Baqa of Sufism in Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love: A Content Analysis.” Global Language Review, IV:I, pp: 28-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glr.2019(IV-I).04.
Eliade, Mircea (1959). Cosmos and History: the Myth of the Eternal Return. Translated by Willard R. Trask, New York: Harper Torch books.  
_____________ (1975). Myths, Dreams and Mysteries: The Encounter between Contemporary Faiths and Archaic Realities. New York: Harper & Row.
____________   (1987). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Translated by Willard R. Trask, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. 
El-Zein, Amira (2010). “Spiritual consumption in the United States: the Rumi phenomenon.” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 11:1, pp. 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/095964100111526.
Faiyaz, Afreen (2019). “Thou Shalt Love!: The Contemporary Relevance Of Rumi In Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules Of Love - A Character Based Study Establishing Love as the Central Theme of the Novel and Humanity.” European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 7:2, pp: 21-31. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Thou-Shalt-Love.pdf.
Furlanetto, Elena (2013). “The ‘Rumi Phenomenon’ between Orientalism and Cosmopolitanism: the Case of Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules Of Love.” European Journal of English Studies, 17:2, pp 201–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.797210.
Ghandeharion, Azra, and Fatemeh Khajavian (2019).  “As Rumi Travels along the Silk Road in Feminist Costume: Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love.” ACTA VIA SERICA, 4:1, pp.71–86. doi:10.22679/avs.2019.4.1.071. 
Gray, Billy (2020). “Rumi, Sufi spirituality and the teacher–disciple relationship in Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love.” Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 29, pp. 124–146. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.84280.
Kökcü, Melih (2020). “Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love between Constructive and Disruptive Cosmopolitanisms.” Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 2:2, pp. 138-151. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1306834.
Mehdi, Muntazar, et al. (2021). “Role of Sufism and Spirituality in Psychological Well Being: A Study of Elif Shafak’s ‘The Forty Rules of Love’ from a Cognitive and Existential Perspective.” Journal of English language Literature and Education, 2:3, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.54692/jelle.2021.020367.
Mohammadi Achachelooei, Elham (2019). “Amnesia: Identity Conflict in Elif Shafak’s Three Daughters of Eve.” 1st University of Isfahan’s International Conference on English Language Studies: Reconciliation of the Disciplines across English Language Studies (ICELS 2019). https://conf.ui.ac.ir/fa/article.php?cnfId=29&lrId=464.     
Morris, James, W. (2001). “Ibn ‘Arabî in the ‘Far West’: Visible and Invisible Influences.” Journal of the Muhyiddin Ibn ‘Arabi Society, 29, pp. 87-121.  http://hdl.handle.net/2345/4233.
Saleh, Asma Mehdi (2022) “Throwing a Stone in the Lake of Marriage: the Rebellious Wife in Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love.” Route Educational & Social Science Journal, 74, pp: 28-37. 
            https://www.ressjournal.com/DergiTamDetay.aspx?ID=3261&Detay=Ozet 
Seblini, Nour (2021). “Evoking Polyvocality in Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love.”  American Research Journal of English and Literature, 7:1, pp: 1-6. https://arjonline.org/papers/arjel/v7-i1/27.pdf
Shafak, Elif (2011). The Forty Rules of Love. London: Penguin Books. 
__________ (February 2017), Elif Shafak: “When women are divided it is the male status quo that benefits.” Interview by K. Kellaway, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/feb/05/elif-shafak-turkey-three-daughters-of-eve-interview.
Zacharia, Anu, and T. Senthamarai (2023). “Gender Roles in Turkish Society: A Journey through Elif Shafak’s Honour and The Forty Rules of Love.” International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 8:3, pp. 222-228. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.83.36.
Zarrabi-Zadeh, Saeed (2015). “Comparative Mysticism and the Problem of Interpretation: Rumi and Meister Eckhart.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 26:3, pp: 287-306.                                                                  
           http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2015.1018721.