A Psychoanalytical Study of William Dorrit’s Character Based on Mark Elin’s Theory of Personality Disorder

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of English Language and Literature.Faculty of Languages and Literature.Arak University, Arak.Iran

Abstract

This interdisciplinary, descriptive, library based research adopts Mark Elin’s theory of “Personality Disorder” to study William Dorrit’s character, whose title in the novel is the “Father of Marshalsea”. Elin’s theory of personality disorder is based upon the functions of “self-memory”, of which “Reality Testing” is an important one. Applying this theory, the research shows that in the first book of the novel, William Dorrit’s personality disorder vacillates between Narcissism and inferiority complex. In the second book, however, his personality disorder turns into “Posttraumatic Stress Disorder” which is caused by the overwhelming events of the past. Reality-testing, does not operate properly in William Dorrit’s mind. Consequently, he is not capable of making distinctions between memory and reality. The final outcome of this incapability is his complete mental breakdown. The other finding of this research is the existence of a structural symmetry between chapters nineteen of both books of the novel, in which the major themes are William Dorrit’s mental and psychological agitations.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bedford, Andrew, and Bonnie Meekums (2010). “Narrating Attachment: Some Lessons Learned from Charles Dickens’ Novel Little Dorrit.” Psychodynamic Practice: Individuals, Groups and Organizations, 16:4, pp. 431-444. doi:10.1080/14753634.2010.510339
Bennett, Rachel (1995). “Hajji and Mermaid in Little Dorrit.” The Review of English Studies, New Series, 46: 182, pp. 174-190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/518553
Carlisle, Janice M (1975). “Little Dorrit: Necessary Fictions.” Studies in the Novel, 7:2, pp. 195-214. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29531716
Crees, Mark (2002). Growing Old with Little Dorrit. The Three Penny Review, 88, pp. 10-13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4385082
Dames, Nicholas (2005). “The Withering of the Individual: Psychology in the Victorian Novel.” A Concise Companion to the Victorian Novel. Edited by Francis O’Gorman. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 91-112.
Davis, Philip (2008). Why Victorian Literature Still Matters. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 
Dickens, Charles (1999). Little Dorrit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edgecombe, Rodney S (1997). “The Displacement of Little Dorrit.” Journal of English and Germanic Philosophy, 96: 3, pp. 369-384. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27711527
Elin, Mark R (2004). “The Role of Trauma, Memory, Neurobiology, and the Self in the Formation of Personality Disorders.” Handbook of Personality Disorders: Theory and Practice. Edited by Jeffrey J. Magnavita. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 443-464. 
Gagnier, Regina (2011). “Freedom, Determinism, and Hope in Little Dorrit: A Literary Anthropology.” Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and History of Ideas, 9:2, pp. 331-346. doi:10.1353/pan.2011.0024
Grove, T. N. (1973). “The Psychological Prison of Arthur Clennam in Dickens’s Little Dorrit.”  The Modern Language Review, 68:4, pp. 750-755. doi:10.2307/3726040 
Holoch, George (1978). “Consciousness and Society in Little Dorrit.” Victorian Studies, 21:3, pp. 335-351. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3827385
Imai, Chizu (2016). “The Labyrinth of Incarceration in Little Dorrit.” JAS4QoL, 2:4, pp. 1-5. https://as4qol.org/JWiSg
Justman, Stewart (2002). “Direct and Indirect Guilt in Little Dorrit.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 85: 1/2, pp. 39-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41179026
Kuskey, Jessica (2014). “Math and the Mechanical Mind: Charles Babbage, Charles Dickens and Mental Labor in Little Dorrit.” Dickens Studies Annual, 45, pp. 247-274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44372235
Librach, Ronald S (1975). “The Burdens of Self and Society: Release and Redemption in Little Dorrit.” Studies in the Novel, 7:4, pp. 538-551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29531753
Love, Willam David Jr. (2015). “The Self-(Un) Made Mother: Jungian Archetypes in Dickens’ Little Dorrit.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mississippi: University of Southern Mississippi. 
Moran, Joe (2002). Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.
Shelley, Mark (2003). Frankenstein. New York: Bantam Classics.
Sperry, Len (1999). Cognitive Behavior Therapy of DSM-IV Personality Disorders: Highly Effective Interventions for the Most Common Personality Disorders. New York: Routledge. 
Stevenson, Lionel (2004). “The Modern Values of Victorian Fiction.” The Victorian Novel (Bloom’s Period Studies). Edited by Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, pp. 47-52. 
Sutherland, Kathryn (1990). “Dickens’ Little Dorrit as Hypertext.” Literary and Linguistic Computing. 5:4, pp. 305-309. doi:10.1093/llc/5.4.305
Vrettos, Athena (2005). “Victorian Psychology.” A Companion to the Victorian Novel. Edited by Patrick Brantlinger and William B. Thesing. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 67-83. 
Wyatt, Jean (1996). “Giving Body to the World: The Maternal Symbolic in Toni Morrison’s Beloved.” A Practical Introduction to Literary Theory and Criticism. Edited by M. Keith Booker. London: Longman, pp. 427-444.