A Comparative Study of Tree Imagery in David Jones’s Paintings and Poems in the Light of Panofsky’s Iconology

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D student in Persian Language and Literature, Department of Persian Language and Literature. University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

2 Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Art Research Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

4 Assistant Professorof Persian Language and Literature, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Abstract

David Jones, the British modern poet-painter, has exploited the elements of nature, particularly the motif of the tree, in both his verbal and visual language. Therefore, the current research, with a purposeful selection of Jones's paintings and poems "In Parenthesis" and "Anathemata", specifically focuses on the tree imagery present in both mediums. This research conducts a comparative and interdisciplinary study of these images based on Panofsky's theory of iconology.

The results of the research show that Jones, as an "anti-modern" modernist, views the modern era as a detrimental factor leading to social and cultural decline, and he criticizes it. Through a poignant connection between the sufferings of Christ and those of contemporary humanity, Jones prompts reflection on modern cultural decadence and the potential for spiritual rejuvenation. He has approached the icon of the tree in paintings and poetry using various techniques of modern painting and poetry. In these images, the tree, with its existential quality, appears with all its rich mythological, historical, and religious past, acquiring symbolic value. In its most prominent symbolic form, the tree transforms into the cross, and the cross transforms into the suffering body of Christ. This wounded body of the tree forms the foundation of Jones's iconic semiotics.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

احمدی، بابک (1400). از نشانه‌های تصویری تا متن، تهران: مرکز.
احمدی، بابک (1388). ساختار و تأویل متن، تهران: مرکز
تاتارکیویچ، ولادیسلاف (1401). تاریخ مفاهیم بنیادین زیبایی شناسی. ترجمۀ حمیدرضا بسحاق، تهران: نشر چشمه.
دنچف، الکس (1399). صد مانیفست: مانیفست‌های هنرمندان از فوتوریست‌ها تا استاکیست‌ها. ترجمۀ مهدی امیرخانلو، تهران: نشر هنوز.
عبدی، ناهید (1390). درآمدی بر آیکونولوژی: نظریه و کاربرد مطالعه موردی نقاشی ایرانی، تهران: نشر سخن. 
فرهادپور، مراد (1395). شعر مدرن از بودلر تا استیونس: گزیده‌ای از مقاله‌ها و شعر‌ها. ترجمۀ مراد فرهادپور، تهران: نشر بیدگل.
فتوحی، محمود (1389) بلاغت تصویر. تهران: سخن.
فتوحی، محمود (1381) «تصویر خیال». نشریه دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی (تبریز). دوره 45. شماره 185. 134-103. 
کرس، گونترآر و لیوون، تئو ون (1398). خوانش تصاویر دستور طراحی بصری. ترجمۀ سجاد کبگانی، تهران: نشر هنر نو. 
کومارا سوامی، آنانداکنتیش (1393). فلسفۀ هنر مسیحی و شرقی. ترجمۀ امیر حسین ذکرگو، تهران: نشر فرهنگستان هنر.
سپهری، سهراب (1401) هشت کتاب. تهران: دیوار.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمد‌رضا (1383) صور خیال در شعر فارسی، تهران: آگاه.
ولک، رنه (1399). تاریخ نقد جدید. ترجمۀ سعید ارباب شیرانی، تهران: نیلوفر.
Alexander, Neal (2019). “His‌tory, geography, poetry: David Jones’s late modernism.”, 26(4). 869-892. https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2019.0062
Bankes, Ariane, and Paul Hills (2015). The Art of David Jones: Vision and Memory. Lund Humphries. 
Brooks, Francesca (2022). Poet of the Medieval Modern: Reading the Early Medieval Library with David Jones. Oxford University Press.
Dudley, Jack (2013).  “Transcendence and the end of Modernis‌t aes‌thetics: David Jones’s in Parenthesis.
     Renascence.”, 65(2). 103-124. https://doi.org/10.5840/renascence20136525
Dirworth, Thomas (1988). The shape of meaning in the poetry of David Jones .University of Toronto Press.
Dirworth, Thomas (2012). David Jones and the Great War. Enitharmon Press.
Dilworth, Thomas (2017). David Jones: Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet. Catapult.
Grisewood, Harman (1997). “Remembering David Jones. The Ches‌terton Review”, 23(1/2). 193-207. https://doi.org/10.5840/ches‌terton1997231/224     
Gray, Nicolete (1989). the Paintings of David Jones. Wes‌terham presss.
Jones, David (1972). The Anathemata. Faber & Faber.
Jones, David (1978). In parenthesis. Faber & Faber.
Jones, David (2017 A). Epoch and Artis‌t. Faber & Faber.
Jones, David (2017 B). The Sleeping Lord: And Other Fragments.  Faber & Faber.
Mersom, Daryl Charles (2015). The Tree as a Site of Debate in Some Writing by DH Lawrence and David   Jones (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bris‌tol).
Panofsky, Erwin (1955). Meaning in the visual arts. The University of Chichago press. Chichago.
Robichaud, Paul Joseph (2001). David Jones, Modernism, and the middle Ages (Doctoral dissertation). 
S‌tanbridge, Paul (2009). The Messy Making of David Jones’s Anathemata. MoveableType, 5. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.1755-4527.043
Svendsen, Anna (2017). “Unfolding the “Implied Theology” of In Parenthesis in Several Biblical and Liturgical Allusions to the Passion of Chris‌t. In David Jones: A Chris‌tian Modernis‌t?” (pp. 195-208). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004356993_015
Svendsen, Anna (2018). The Shape of Sacrifice in David Jones’ Landscape of War (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).
Taylor, Paul (2022). Iconography: How Images Mean. Manuscript in preparation. 
Wakelin, Peter (2023). Hill-rhythms: David Jones + Capel-y-ffin .Grey Mare Press.
https://www.kettlesyard.cam.ac.uk/objects/vexilla-regis 1402/11/20
https://www.britannica.com  1402/11/20
https://www.biblegateway.com  1402/11/20
Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature, Arts and Humanities
Volume 4, Issue 2 - Serial Number 8
October 2024
Pages 383-412

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 May 2024
  • Revise Date: 12 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 14 September 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics